Speech The Power Of Speech - 1770 Words

The Power of Speech Speech is a powerful tool, if used correctly. Speech can do many things, but there are two main things that speech is the best at. It can create and embellish as it pleases. Well-spoken words can also twist the truth and manipulate. Richard the Third is an excellent example of both these attributes. Richard uses the power of speech to gain what he wants. He shows the success that this tool can bring if used carefully. Richard makes himself a saint, a simple disabled innocent who is wronged by everyone. He also shows the failures it brings when overconfidence and haste spoil it. He loses his charm as he no longer treads carefully and simply drives his way through conversations. Richard is a good example of the power of speech as he uses his persuasion to accomplish his goals. From the very beginning, Richard is shown as being a highly persuasive individual. He is very careful to show himself as one who only speaks sweet words making him a very compelling character. He flatters his way to his goals and pulls the wool over everyone’s eyes as he does so. There are several scenes throughout the play where Richard has done this. In his attempt to woo Lady Anne, Richard is speaking to the enraged woman, noting on that it is â€Å"wonderful when angels are so angry† (1.2.72). Richard’s response to this seething rage is to create a beautiful angry angel of her. Another attempt at this flattery is made when he responds that â€Å"your [Lady Anne’s] bedchamber† would beShow MoreRelatedPower of Speech1450 Words   |  6 Pagesa better future. â€Å"‘Who controls the past’†¦ ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past’† (Orwell 37). If the United States’ history was altered and no one remembered the history before it changed, the government would have the power to make any regulations they desired. The government would be able to do as they please becaus e if the people do not have any history to tell them that the new regulations are out of place or wrong, people would not question it. Much like in GeorgeRead MoreFreedom Of Speech : The Power Of Freedom Of Speech1860 Words   |  8 Pages Freedom of speech would be easy if words did not have power. Guaranteeing people, the right to say and print whatever they wanted would be easy if we could believe that words had no real effect. But unfortunately, Americans tend to believe that words do have power and that they can anger and inspire, cause people to rise up and act out in harmful ways. Americans celebrate speakers like James Otis, Abraham Lincoln, and Martin Luther King, Jr., whose words inspired people to fight for independenceRead MoreSpeech Is Power Of Speech Changed The Course Of History Essay1613 Words   |  7 PagesRalph Waldo Emerson expressed the importance of speech in one short sentence: â€Å"Speech is power: speech is to persuade, to convert, to compel.† In 2008, the power of speech changed the course of history; the first African American president was elected, transcending years of racial inequality. For many blacks in the U.S., and many around the world, Barack Obama’s presidency was a step closer to righting America’s 400-year-old wrong: slavery and subsequent discrimination toward the black race. Obama’sRead MoreThe Power Of Speech By Janie1957 Words   |  8 Pages The Power of Speech. Throughout her life, Janie has always been told what to do. She could not express herself without being criticized. She is not given the chance to make decisions for herself because she is a woman and women were to expected to obey and not talk back. It is deemed wrong anytime she tries to stand up for herself. Throughout Janie’s life seems to be is controlled by others, first her grandmother, then Logan Killicks, and Joe Starks. Janie’s first husband Logan, thinks a JanieRead MoreJulius Caesar Power Of Speech921 Words   |  4 PagesMarissa Cheslock Mrs. Satchwell Honors English 9 B3 9 October 2017 The Power of Loyalty William Shakespeare, one of the most profound writers in all of history, skillfully used the character of Mark Antony in his play, Julius Caesar, in order to verify true the theme that loyalty and respect are two of the most extremely convincing tactics. He demonstrates the power of speech as he is manipulating words in order to prove a certain point in the speaker’s favor, whoever that may be. Mark Antony wasRead MoreThe Power Of Peace Speech Summary767 Words   |  4 Pages The Power of Peace During his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, Martin Luther King Jr. declared, â€Å"I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word in reality. This is why right temporarily defeated is stronger than evil triumphant.† As a model for the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr. attested to the effectiveness of a nonviolent approach to difficult situations. Cesar Chavez urges the importance of a peaceful approach to every situation, and emphasizesRead MorePersuasive Speech : Solar Power1022 Words   |  5 Pages SOLAR POWER General Purpose: To persuade Specific Purpose: To persuade my audience to use more solar power, to save money and help the environment. Introduction Attention Getter: We are 90 million miles from the sun, but in merely ten minutes light travels all of that distance to the earth. This extraordinary speed and natural light can help us to power homes and businesses with the use of solar panels. Reason to Lister: NaturalRead MorePersuasive Speech : Girl Power 1448 Words   |  6 Pagesthe concept will make society appear friendly. - - - Innovative invention for decades have by habit woken up our youth culture from their hormonal apathetic doldrums - I confess, it has been a durable sleep since Britpop and that exhaustive Girl Power message which energised youth culture to fever pitch. Youth culture overtax surely, I recall watching our youth culture engaging in Spice mania thinking, you ll better stop, or you will burn yourselves out by the time you are a young adult...Read MoreInformative Speech On Nuclear Power753 Words   |  4 Pagescivilization. And hydroelectric and thermal power plants are not as clean and economical for the modern rhythm of life. Thesis: One of the solutions is nuclear power. The basis of nuclear power are nuclear power plants. The use of nuclear energy in the modern world is becoming so important that if we woke tomorrow and the energy of nuclear reaction disappeared, the world, as we know it, would probably cease to exist. Preview: so what is this nuclear power, how does it work? And is it that safe asRead MorePower Tactics, Power Speech, And Power Nonverbals Used In The Movie1075 Words   |  5 Pages 6. How are power tactics, power speech, and power nonverbals used in the movie? Give one example of each from the movie Power tactics are defined by the Forsyth text (p 254) as â€Å"specific strategies used to influence others, usually to gain a particular objective or advantage.† People will vary in their use of tactics to get there way, especially depending on where they stand in a group. Tactics are utilized from the time deliberations begin in the film. The garage owner engages in expertise tactics

A Comparison Of Frankendoodle And Frankenstein - 1199 Words

â€Å"Frankendoodle† in Comparison to the Original text â€Å"Frankenstein† Frankenstein is a classic science fiction novel written by Mary Shelley, through the ages, many adaptations have taken the story through various forms of popular culture. SpongeBob Squarepants, a popular children s television show often alludes to classic literature, and makes it entertaining for all ages. While this example is quite comical, it does hold classical elements associated with Frankenstein, but takes a spin on the classic science fiction novel. In this essay I will consider the similarities and differences between the two texts; â€Å"Frankendoodle† as well as Frankenstein. By looking at the allusion apparent in â€Å"Frankendoodle†, it is clear to see that many of the†¦show more content†¦Being an artist is a heavy responsibility. Each work of art is like a child and must be treated as such. (Frankendoodle Transcript line 34) Patrick continues on and draws and one of SpongeBob’s neighbours Squidward. When the drawing comes to life, both Spo ngeBob and Patrick decide it is â€Å"[...]kind of creepy when it moves† (Frankendoodle Transcript line 38), and decide to erase and allow their minds to be at ease. Following, SpongeBob decides to make a replica of himself named â€Å"Doodlebob† (also known as Frankendoodle) which they use to frighten his neighbour for entertainment. As both Patrick and SpongeBob watch their creation scare their neighbour, Squidward is being brutally beaten by Doodlebob. It s revealed that both SpongeBob and Patrick are completely terrified of Doodlebob, and Patrick outright refuses to confront him, until being convinced by SpongeBob. At this point in the text, Doodlebob has stolen the pencil that gave him life and even recreates SpongeBob s house, proving that although he is unable to communicate, he bares enough intelligence to be spiteful of his creator. SpongeBob gains the upper hand while all three dual for the ownage of the magic pencil and erases DoodleBob face while exclaim ing: â€Å"I brought you into this world and now I m gonna take you out. Any last words?† (Frankendoodle Transcript line 77) SpongeBobShow MoreRelatedFrankendoodle And Frankenstein1079 Words   |  5 PagesFrankenstein is a classic science fiction novel written by Mary Shelley, through the ages, many adaptations have taken the story through various forms of popular culture. SpongeBob Squarepants, a popular children s television show often alludes to classic literature, and makes it entertaining for all ages. While this example is quite comical, it does hold classical elements associated with Frankenstein, but takes a spin on the classic science fiction novel. In this essay I will consider the similarities

Essay on Appearance vs Reality in Everyday Use and The...

Appearance versus Reality in Alice Walkers and Zora Neale Hurstons Everyday Use and The Gilded Six-Bits In The Gilded Six-Bits it appears that Otis D. Slemmons, the towns newest arrival, is rich, but by closer inspection by Joe Banks and Missie May, is found to be poor. In Everyday Use, Maggie doesnt appear to be smart enough to honor and appreciate her heritage, but she and not Dee/Wangero is really preserving the family traditions as well as heritage. Both The Gilded Six-Bits by Zora Neale Hurston and Everyday Use by Alice Walker have the theme of appearance and reality. Hurston and Walker use the theme of appearance versus reality to convey the message that things arent always as simple as the outward†¦show more content†¦They were both taken in by his slick ways. The lesson has been costly but because the foundation upon which the marriage was built has been strong, the marriage has survived. Missie and Joe genuinely love each other and both have enough courage, determination, and trust in each other to weather the storm (Howard 152). The marriage was built on a stron g reality. They were both taken in by Slemmons (slimy), but they had to remember that all they really needed was each other. Joe remarks, That was the best part of life - going home to Missie May. Their white-washed house, the mock battles on Saturday, the dinner and ice cream parlor afterwards, church on Sunday nights when Missie outdressed any woman in town - all, everything was right (2091). Robert Bone, in his book Down Home: Origins of the Afro-American Short Story says, Hurstons sole attempt to deal with the urban scene, depicts the self in jeopardy from false, urban values. The Gilded Six-Bits brings the theme full circle (138). Missie and Joe have to, and do, get back to their original simple ways of showing affection for each other. Performing the little rituals they did before being dazzled by Slemmons, and his false outward appearance. The theme of appearance and reality more clearly comes through in the story Everyday Use. The older daughter in the story Dee/Wangero appears to be in touch with her heritage. As Houston Baker and Charlotte Pierce-Baker point

Analysis Of The Prelude And Lord Byron s Biting Epic

The Romantic poets sought to write epic poems that incorporated new philosophies, ideals, and literary trends, while also parodying, satirizing and deconstructing the epic poem itself. Rather than merely extend the epic tradition, the Romantic poets subverted the characteristics and tropes attributed to epic poetry, in turn creating an interesting revision of the epic. Two seminal works of Romantic poetry that adequately showcase the revision of epic tradition are William Wordsworth’s introspective epic The Prelude and Lord Byron’s biting epic satire Don Juan. Incorporating either introspection and reflection or irony and satire, both works incorporate themes from the epic tradition while also subverting its significant aspects. It is†¦show more content†¦Wordsworth is known for his introspection, often writing about feelings, emotions, mortality, and nature. Wordsworth’s The Prelude is a seminal work and a prime example of the romantic revision of epic tradition. The poem is about the growth of the poet’s mind. It is autobiographical and deals with different periods of Wordsworth’s life, such as his childhood, his time at Cambridge and his residence in France. The poem features Wordsworth reflecting on his experiences and feelings, and the poem acts as a look into how he views himself as a poet. In The Politics of the Epic: Wordsworth, Byron, and the Romantic Redefinition of Heroism, author Paul Cantor contends that despite the use of epic writing, the poem itself is vastly different from the epic. â€Å"It is written in an elevated blank verse that often has a Miltonic ring, it contains epic diction and epic similes, and it shows many other signs of Wordsworth s attempt to wo rk within the established epic tradition. But if one looks at the beginning of the poem, where the epic poet traditionally invokes his Muse, one can see how radically Wordsworth differs from his predecessor† (Cantor, 377). The poem seems to mimic the Miltonic epic in its style and diction. This does not mean, however, that Wordsworth intended to follow the conventions of the epic, as The Prelude breaks several of the conventions of classical epic poetry. For instance, the poem does not deal

Factors That Influence Leadership Style Of Leadership

Technology and technology- change is not the reason for these 11 companies became great. These companies study the new technology and pick the right one that suites their company and use it to their advantage. The success of these great companies does not happen overnight. Each company went through a quite, thoughtful process of figuring out what needed to be done to create the best future for the company. Taking one step at a time until they reach their breakthrough moments (Collins, 2001, p. 165). After reading Good to Great, there are several concepts that are different from the Hersey and Blanchard textbook and from the information from the readings that I did from different sources for the previous assignment and class discussions. Jim’s book level 5 leadership is needed for the company to be great. Not all leaders have level 5 characteristics, but it does not mean that you can not be an effective leader. There are many factors that influence one style of leadership. Leadership skills can be developed if you know your strengths and weaknesses. Through time, leadership can be changed by the experiences, different situations and challenges we encounter in life. Vision is fundamental in leading an organization . In Hersey’s book to be an effective leader, one should create mission, vision first to drive the company on the path where he/she wants the organization to achieve. Vision, mission and values align the employees to a common goal that makes a Show MoreRelatedEssay about Understanding Leadership1102 Words   |  5 PagesUnderstanding leadership Learner name: Learner registration number: Note: The ‘lines/box’ below a question is for guidance purposes only. Marks are not deducted for writing more. It is perfectly acceptable for all answers to be continued on additional forms provided they are attached to the assignment when making a submission. The availability of the form electronically allows learners to expand the ‘lines/box’ as required. | UNDERSTAND LEADERSHIP STYLES 1.1 Describe the factors that willRead MoreAnalysis of Leadership Theories958 Words   |  4 PagesLeadership Theories Analysis Leadership theories These leadership theories are grouped in trait theories, behavioral theories, contingency theories, and power and influence theories. Trait theories focus on the traits and skills that successful leaders must have. Initially, these theories state that these skills are innate, but research shows that individuals can also develop such skills and become leaders. Behavioral theories focus on other issues, like the behavior of leaders within their teamsRead MoreTheories Of Leadership And Leadership974 Words   |  4 PagesTheories of Leadership Introduction It is true that leadership and leadership theories in general, are not scientifically precise in nature. For example, some may argue that going into an apprentice program have a higher level of task-relevance education and/or experience in the field you choose. A higher relevance than a degree in Liberal Arts. Thus, one must evaluate the apprentice program and accept the responsibility of doing the apprentice work. A degree in Liberal Arts scientifically, isRead MoreDifferent Types Of Leadership Styles1330 Words   |  6 PagesWhat is Leadership? Why are there so many types of Leadership? Which one is the right one? These are all important questions people who are trying to lead ask. John Maxwell a well-known author on leadership stated simply â€Å"Leadership is influence†. There are numerous types of leadership styles, they all have their strong points about them, and depending who you are the circumstances can dictate which type of person with what type of leadership style will be successful. In this paper I will discussRead MoreThe Teacher Leadership Compensation Model Es say1245 Words   |  5 Pagesof the literature pertaining to educational leadership, including general theoretical concepts of effective leaders, trends in educational leadership, effective personal leadership traits of school leaders, and the Iowa Teacher Leadership Compensation model. First, this review provides a foundation by examining theoretical concepts in general leadership theories. It focuses on historical trends in general leadership as we as general personal leadership traits of effective leaders. Next, this reviewRead MoreEffective Leadership Styles Within The Workplace1584 Words   |  7 PagesEffective leadership styles Abstract An effective leader influences their employees in a desired manner to achieve goals and objectives. Different leadership styles can affect an organization’s effectiveness and performance. The objective of this paper is to analyze the review of literature on various leadership styles over the past years and how effective and ineffective different leadership styles are in the workplace. Introduction A leader is defined as a person with responsibility to influenceRead MoreConcept Of An Advancing Leadership Style1660 Words   |  7 Pagesconcept of an Advancing Leadership Style. I will identify the characteristics of a leader, and the external and internal environments that would play a part in any leadership style. Additionally, I will demonstrate how this leadership model assists in moving the organization forward in the direction of the mission or goal and assist in defining the organizational culture. Finally, I will show how this model is useful to the leader and followers by comparing other leadership models and their effectsRead MoreTheories Of Leadership Styles And Job Satisfaction Among Employees Serve As Predictors Of Innovation1399 Words   |  6 Pagescontingency theory, Adams’ Equity Theory, Herzberg’s Two Factor theory, and the transformational-transactional organizational theories of leadership. Traditional leadership and motivational theories have f ailed to address how leadership styles and job satisfaction among employees serve as predictors of innovation in organizations. The strategic literature highlights leadership style and employee job satisfaction as an especially important influence on organizational innovation (Garcia-Morales, Jimenez-BarrionuevoRead MoreTest 1: Leadership Management Essays1103 Words   |  5 PagesTrue - A factor common to the leadership classification systems is the view of leadership as a process of influence. True - According to Burns, followers should remember that their leaders are above them and act accordingly. False - An individual perceived by other group members as influential can only be an assigned leader, not an emergent one. False - Followers usually are responsible for maintaining the relationship with leaders. False - Kotter argues that managerial and leadership functionsRead MoreLeadership Theory : Transformational And Transactional Leadership Theories1137 Words   |  5 Pagessituational leadership. In some instances, situational leadership is part of a broader theory and vice versa. Related theories include transformational and transactional leadership, contingency theory, path-goal theory, and personality theories. Life Cycle Theory was not included since situational leadership originated from Life Cycle Theory. Transformational and Transactional Leadership Theories According to McCleskey (2014), transformational leadership theory is the most studied leadership theory

Barn Burning By William Faulkn Essay Research free essay sample

Barn Burning By William Faulkn Essay, Research Paper A Critical Approach to Faulkner s Barn Burning In Barn Burning, by William Faulkner, a renter farming household is forced to travel after the male parent, Abner, set fire to his neighbour s barn. Abner did this in revenge of the neighbour s maintaining Abner s pig that kept acquiring in the neighbour s yard. This was the 12th clip in ten old ages that the household had to travel due to Abner s fierce choler and vindictive Acts of the Apostless. Upon their reaching at their new renter farm, Abner and his youngest boy, Sarty, take a amble up to the chief house to talk with the landholder, Major de Spain. When they arrived at the chief house, Abner intentionally stepped in manure before come ining the house. He refused to pass over his pess even though he was told to make so. He rubbed the manure in, staining the expensive carpet, and refused to clean it. The Major so took Abner to tribunal. Sarty, a ten-year-old male child, knew his male parent expected him to lie, and he was torn between staying loyal to his male parent and making what was right. The Justice of the Peace ordered Abner to refund the Major with 10 bushels of maize from his harvest. That dark, in revenge Abner decides to fire Major de Spain s barn. Abner Snopes was a difficult adult male who expected his household to accept his beliefs, without inquiry. He was a adult male full of resentment and choler who felt it the right thing to make to take retribution upon anyone who did him wrong. Sarty, his youngest boy, dealt with an interior struggle of staying loyal to his male parent and household ties and making what was morally right. Sarty, after much inner struggle, ran to warn de Spain of his male parent s purposes. He heard two gun shootings and realized that his male parent had been kil led. Alternatively of returning place, Sarty ran off and neer looked back. He felt a small guilty, but largely relieved that he was at last free of that life style and the interior struggle. Throughout the narrative, Sarty was torn between his male parent s beliefs and making what he felt was right. In the terminal he decided to make what was morally right which meant that he had to abandon his household. He volitionally broke off from the oppressive conditions of his household and isolated himself from everything he had of all time known. In Barn Burning, secret plan, character, puting, point of position, and symbolism all promote the development of the thought that when one is faced with a hard determination, that individual should trust on his or her ain values, non those of his or her household, to do the right pick. Faulkner s Barn Burning is a dangerous narrative because it really clearly shows the classical battle between the privileged and the unprivileged categories in the late 19th century after the Civil War. Time after clip emotions of desperation surface from both the supporter and adversary involved in the narrative. This narrative outlines one distinguishable supporter and one distinguishable adversary. The supporter is Colonel Sartoris Snopes ( Sarty ) , a ten-year-old male child, and the adversary is his male parent Abner Snopes. Sarty, the supporter, is surrounded by his male parent s hostility. Abner Snopes is opposed to the societal construction and the battle that it imposed on him and his household. Abner makes the determinations for his household though they may non ever be right. In Oliver Billingslea s unfavorable judgment, he states, What Abner Snopes has done is making to his household is to smother each member s individualism. His subject is inhibitory, about Puritanical ( Billingslea 293 ) . Abner conflicts against any authorization. He does what he wants no affair what the effects are. Sarty is Abner s merely existent fright. He realizes that Sarty is a good child and will turn him in if he is given the opportunity. While contending against important figures, Abner is besides combating Sarty and Sarty s good will. Sarty refers to Abner as being cut out of Sn ( Faulkner 149 ) . He believes that Abner is cold, tough, and unwilling to flex for anything. He knows that Abner is set in his ways and doesn T program to alter for anything or anyone. Sarty is afraid of his male parent and knows what Abner is capable of. For this ground, Sarty feels the demand to be loyal to Abner, his male parent. At the same clip, he realizes that Abner is non carry throughing anything by his actions. Their household is enduring because of Abner. Sarty is easy turning up throughout the narrative. Equally shortly as Sarty warns Major de Spain, a landholder who they worked for, of Abner s purpose to fire his barn, Sarty mentally made the determination to go forth childhood and go a adult male. At that point he took his hereafter into his ain custodies and no longer allowed anyone, including Ab, to make up ones mind how he would populate his life. Harmonizing to Oliver Billingslea, William Faulkner s Barn Burning is a narrative about the relationship between a male parent and his boies, non merely in the familial sense of blood ties, but in a religious sense every bit good, particularly in regard to how the younger boy s scruples dictates action. It is the narrative of one male child s relationship to what Faulkner called the old truths and truths of the bosom, evidenced in Sarty s pursuit for a male parent figure that will give significance and order to his life ( Billingslea 287 ) . Nicolet s treatment takes a different attack in his unfavorable judgment: William Faulkner s Barn Burning is basically a morality drama in which good and evil, embodied in the struggle between Abner Snopes ( who represents what will go Snopesism in general ) and the basically nice by comparatively powerless universe of the Justice of the Peace s tribunal and symbolized by the two parts of immature Sarty s name ( Colonel Sartoris Snopes ) , conflict for the male child s psyche ( Nicolet 25 ) . In Faulkner s Barn Burning three chief characters stand out # 8211 ; Major de Spain Abner, and Sarty. Major de Spain is a member of the Southern nobility, but with a making: his name, which connects him with neither the Protestant upper category nor the Bourbons or other French-descended grandees of the Old South. The name de Spain suggests the about submersed Spanish presence in Louisiana and Florida, or even the Creole, or visible radiation skinned free inkinesss of New Orleans ( Short Stories For Students 4 ) . In the narrative Abner has a fiery self-importance and a bit on his shoulder. He takes discourtesy with authorization ( the landholders ) , and his life seems to be a series of fortunes that invoke discourtesy, retaliation, and running off after he burns the barns. Harmonizing to Loges unfavorable judgment, Abner Snopes is depicted as a adult male who will non waver to arouse the power of fire against those who oppose him. In Barn Burning the storyteller suggests that for Abner, fire has about mystical powers. This association with fire provides another correlativity with the scriptural Abner. Eight times in the Old Testament Abner is referred to as the boy of Ner. In Hebrew Net means to glitter or reflect as in a lamp ( Strong 78-80 ) . The name is derived from a Chaldeean root nuwr, which is translated in the Old Testament as fiery or fire ( Strong 77 ) . Therefore in the Hebrew, Abner becomes the boy of fire or combustion ( Loges ) . Loges believes Abner s name and his character a re similar to the Bible character Abner in the book of Samuel. In Faulkner s Barn Burning, another chief character is Colonel Sartoris Snopes, or Sarty, as he was called for short. Sarty short for Colonel Sartoris Snopes bears the name of a celebrated Rebel commanding officer from the civil war under whom, possibly, his male parent Abner Snopes served ; ( Short narratives for pupils 4 ) . In Bradford s unfavorable judgment, he refers to Sarty as an extraordinary male child who is the immature boy of Abner Snopes, the caput of that ugly kin. In the class of the narrative Sarty becomes what his given name suggests, a protagonist of that larger household that is community and a defender of right order ( Bradford 332 ) . Sarty was little and stringy like his male parent, in patched and faded denims even excessively little for him, with consecutive, uncombed, brown hair and eyes grey. This immature male child is torn between trueness to his male parent and morality, and the narrative trades with this battle. Sarty is an unsloped character, altering t hroughout the narrative as he moves from lodging to his ain blood and inherent aptitudes to believing more of himself and his ain public assistance. At first he is highly loyal to his male parent, but as the male parent digs a deeper hole for himself and his household, Sarty realizes that his life is a barbarous rhythm of the same state of affairss in every town they live. In the first scene, Sarty knows that his male parent wants him to lie, and he acknowledges that he will hold to make so, despite strong feelings that it is the incorrect thing to make. He fears his male parent more than he wishes to move as he would wish to. Harmonizing to Hiles, You re acquiring to be a adult male.You got to larn to lodge to your ain blood or you ain t traveling to hold any blood to lodge to you: Abner Snopes s warning to his boy, Colonel Sartoris ( or Sarty ) , introduces a cardinal issue in Faulkner s Barn Burning the affinity bond, which the narrative s storyteller calls the old ferocious pull of blood ( Hiles 329 ) . Sa rty watches his male parent get kicked out of town, path manure over his new employer s old-timer carpet, suffer the indignity of holding to clean it, and so fire the landlord s barn down. As this occurs, he drifts more and more out of the mentality that his male parent prefers, and he additions some sense of duty and justness and settles into the position that he will hold to take action to halt this from go oning. Finally, Sarty warns the landlord that his male parent is firing his barn, and so he leaves his household. This is an entryway into another type of life, another mentality of life, and a new freedom that would hold been nonexistent if he had remained in his male parent s clasp. Sarty changed from a male child who was really afraid of his male parent to one who took action as a immature adult male. He was cognizant of the effects of his actions and willing to confront them in stead of staying where he was. Sarty was left entirely as he watched his household travel on and g o forth him. Although Sarty had no book larning to convey into experiences, nevertheless, he did expose grounds of natural brightness his emerging sense of morality, a characteristic non shared by his male parent. The scene of Barn Burning is intensely of import to the narrative. It is the post-Civil War South, 10 to 15 old ages after the War, in which a defeated and in many ways humiliated society is seeking to keep its ain against the Northern master. The South has retreated into plantation life and small-town being. Harmonizing to Johnston, Barn Burning is a chapter in the go oning narrative of this obstinate retreat. A coevals after war, the planter-aristocracy is still rather powerful as we see by the fact that Major de Spain is a big landholder and lives in a white sign of the zodiac, staffed by Negro retainers and furnished with imported carpets and glistening pendants ( Johnston 436 ) . Privately, it maintains the societal power construction that was existing before the war. Slavery had been abolished, but the master-slave relationship outlook was really much alive. There was a great separation between the Southern nobility and the renter husbandmans and workers who did the labour on t he plantations. The Snopes belonged to the lower rank of these migratory workers, itinerant sharecrop farmers, who moved from one topographic point to another, paying for their stay by giving portion of the harvest to the landlord. In line with Abner s character, this life style created an intense bitterness. In a manner the narrative s scene could be the route since Sarty s household moved invariably and lived in at least a twelve ramshackle houses on at least a twelve plantations in his 10 short old ages. Their frequent travel from one topographic point to another was due to his male parent s quarreling and force. The waggon, heaped with suffering properties, was a consistent scene for Sarty. Faulkner s manner is to state narratives with a peculiar point of position. In Barn Burning Faulkner tells his narrative chiefly from the point of position of immature Sarty, a 10 year-old male child. Harmonizing to Franklin, Faulkner anchors the narrative most efficaciously in Sarty s perceptual experiences, and his method fits his capable absolutely ( Franklin 192 ) . He illustrated events and state of affairss as an illiterate ten-year-old would. Sarty sees images on labels of assorted goods in the shop, but can non read and understand what the labels say. Sarty was intimidated and felt really little when grownups towered above him, and he struggled with moral and rational determinations. The storyteller described Sarty s young person as a disability. Young Sarty could non show himself to convey his ain significance to his being, and this added to the power that Abner possessed over him. Sarty was unwillingly prepared to lie for his male parent and to support his him at the Justic e of Peace s tribunal. Sarty had to invariably remind himself that his male parent s enemy was besides his enemy. He besides fought a male child twice his size when the male child ridiculed Sarty s household. However, Sarty, cognizing that firing other people s belongings was incorrect, hoped that his male parent would halt these rough Acts of the Apostless. His male parent did non alteration, and subsequently, when Abner began to fire the Major s barn, Sarty s moral battle ended when he made the determination to liberate himself from his blood ties and run to warn the Major. At this point Sarty reached for the positive in life and for the opportunity to be a better adult male than his male parent. Harmonizing to Ford, the storyteller a sophisticated, rational, and first poetic presence # 8211 ; absorbs and interprets Sarty s anguish for the reader. The reader at the same time experiences the terror-struck kid s hurt and the storyteller s rationalizing of Sarty s agony. The storyte ller intermixes Sarty s yesteryear, nowadays, and hereafter, and, by superposing these beds of clip on one another, distills this moving, passionate minute to its absolute kernel ( Ford 1 ) . William Faulkner s Barn Burning is a short narrative that focuses on a household of renter husbandmans, the Snopes, in the South shortly after the Civil War. Faulkner is known for his usage of symbolism throughout his many narratives about the South, and this narrative is no exclusion. When reading Barn Burning, one can happen symbolism everyplace. Faulkner uses things every bit simple as a carpet or manure in order to convey out his points. The carpet is the belongings of Major de Spain, the adult male that hired Abner Snopes as a renter husbandman. As Abner walks up to de Spain s house, he purposefully steps in manure, and so he ignores the servant s petition to pass over his boots off before come ining the house. When he enters the de Spain house, he wipes every bit much of the manure as he can onto the expensive carpet that Major de Spain had purchased in France. He does non trouble oneself to pass over the manure off his boots until he leaves the house. The manure symbolizes Abn er s discourtesy for those who have more that he does and his desire to destruct what those above him have. The carpet symbolizes a place in life that he can non achieve. He is a acrimonious renter husbandman who refuses to work for the really things in life that cause him to be covetous of other people. Not merely did Abner non desire to work to gain money to purchase the finer things in life, he did non desire others to work and gain money to purchase them. He was clearly resentful and angry toward the Major who had worked hard and earned money to purchase finer things. He showed his hatred and green-eyed monster for the upper category when he destroyed the carpet, non one time, but twice. In Fowler s unfavorable judgment, she denotes that Much of the action in Barn Burning does concentrate, in fact, on Abner Snopes clangs with Major de Spain and the society whose values de Spain embodies. Conflict between Abner and de Spain develops about instantly in the narrative, the consequen ce of Abner s deliberate hostility ( Fowler 514 ) . Another critical symbol in the narrative is fire. The fire symbolizes the male parent s ill will and animus toward those he perceives as better than he is. The narrative used the symbolism of fire in two ways. The narrative begins and ends with the firing down of a barn. When Abner became angry and coveted retribution, he resorted to rashly destructing the belongings of whomever he thought did him wrong. Abner thought that destructing the belongings with fire would do things right. Fire destroys anything that gets in its manner. It will non halt until forced to discontinue. Just like fire, Abner had no regard for boundaries and did non discontinue until forced to. In Barn Burning fire besides represented choler and power. Due to the utmost cold, Abner built a little, contained fire. Faulkner described this fire as a little fire, neat, niggard about, a astute fire ; such fires were his male parent s wont and usage ever ( Faulkner 147 ) . From this, Faulkner showed Abner s deeper confederation with fire, its possible and its power. He respected it, and as a consequence of this regard, he used it as his greatest arm. In a sense, his relationship to fire demonstrated his relationship to his ain choler and the huge power that his choler had over him. Rather than vent his angry feelings, Abner held them in ( merely like the contained fire ) until he could flog out with full retribution by firing a barn. In decision, the struggle between Sarty and his male parent eventually ended when Sarty made the pick to swear himself and his natural sense of morality, even though it cost him his male parent and his household ties. The immature Sarty Snopes volitionally separated himself from the oppressive conditions of his household, therefore insulating himself from all he had of all time known. He had made the determination to go forth childhood and go a adult male. He had taken his hereafter into his ain custodies and would no longer let Abner or anyone else to make up ones mind how he would populate his life. Even though he was excessively immature to understand, he had accepted the pick he had made and would non look back. Faulkner ended the narrative by stating, He went on down the hill toward the dark forests within which the liquid Ag voices of the birds called unceasing the rapid and pressing whipping of the pressing and quiring bosom of the late spring dark. He did non look back ( Faul kner 157 ) .

Important Presidential Elections Essay Thesis Example For Students

Important Presidential Elections Essay Thesis Some of the most important presidential elections1812 The election of 1812 consisted of a battle between James Madison, and DeWitt Clinton. Madison had represented both Democratic and Republicanbeliefs, while Clinton was a Federalist. James Madison was born in Port Conway, Va., on March 16, 1751. APrinceton graduate, he joined the struggle for independence on his returnto Virginia in 1771. He had been an active politician in the 1770s and1780s. He was greatly know for championing the Jefferson reform program,and in the Continental Congress. Madison, in collaboration, hadparticipated greatly in the, Federalist, a paper whos main purpose was toratify the constitution. Madison first became president in 1809, when hebested Charles C. Pickney. He had led the U.S. in a very unpopular war, inwhich the U.S. hadnt been prepared forthe War of 1812. De Witt Clinton was a Federalist, whos main purpose of the election wasto get the U.S. out of a war in which he felt was very unnecessary. DeWittheld every major elective office in New York between 1797 and1828assemblyman, senator, mayor of New York City, lieutenant governor,and governor. He was a philanthropist and patron of the arts and scienceand, as canal commissioner, cham pioned construction of the Erie andChamplain canals The method in which these candidates received nomination was by theElectoral College, or by King Caucus. The idea of political conventionshad not been present at this time. There were no third-party candidates inthis election. The major issue of this election was the War of 1812. The War of 1812, orMr. Madisons War, had been very unpopular among different sections ofAmerica. Mainly the ship owners in New England. The war was supposed toprotect. This war was supposed to help their shipping, but instead, it hadkept them from trading and making money. The winner of the election of 1812 was James Madison. Madison collected128 electoral votes, while Clinton received 89, and the number of No VotesCast was 1. The Vice-presidential candidate, who won the election wasElbridge Gerry, who received 131 electoral votes, while Jared Ingersollreceived 86. There was no record of the number of popular votes for thiselection. My opinion of why Madison had won the election is because he had led thecountry into the War of 1812, and therefore, he should be allowed to fightit. He was also much more popular than De Witt Clinton. Madisons part inratifying the Constitution, and his other early deeds, were alsoinfluential on the voters minds. He also did pretty well during his firstterm. 1844 The candidates for the election of 1844 were James K. Polk, and HenryClay. Two very respectable men, who had great plans for the U.S. Polkrepresented the Democratic party, while Clay represented the Whigs. James Knox Polk was born in Mecklenburg County, N.C., on November 2, 1795. He graduated from the University of North Carolina, from which he thenmoved to Tennessee, where he became prominent in state politics. He waselected to the house of representatives in 1825. He was elected Speaker ofthe House in 1835. Four years later, he was elected governor of Tennessee,but was beaten in tries for re-election in 1841, and 1843. Martin VanBuren, the president prior to the 1844 election, counted on Polk as hisrunning mate; but when Van Burens stand on Texas alienated Southernsupport, the convention swung to Polk on the Ninth ballot. Henry Clay, a key figure in U.S. politics during the first half of the19th century, was a master of the art of political compromise. Born inHanover County, Va., on April 12, 1777, he studied law in Richmond andmoved to the frontier state of Kentucky in 1797. Clay became more and moreimportant in Kentucky politics, becoming speaker of the state assembly in1807, and winning election to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1811. Clay made his first try for the presidency in 1824. Four men ran,including Andrew Jackson, were on the ballot. When no candidate won amajority, Clay threw his support to John Quincy Adams. Adams won andpromptly named Clay his secretary of state. The party members won their candidacy by primary. The major upset of thistime happened during the Democratic convention. Everyone expected VanBuren to be named the Democratic candidate, but because of Van Burensstand on Texas, the nomination went to Polk. This election had nothird-party candidates. The major issue of this election was the issue of Texas. Polk and theDemocrats, wanted Texas in the Union. Clay also wanted Texas, but he wasafraid that the acquisition of Texas would lead to war with Mexico. Claynever made it clear just where the Whig party stood. The Oregon territoryhad also been a big part of this election. Oregon was the name given toall the land between Alaska and California, west of the Rocky Mountains. Both Great Britain and the U.S. claimed it. Polk said that the Oregonterritory would be Americas, even if it led to war. The winner of the election was James K. Polk. He pulled in 170 electoralvotes, while Henry Clay received 105. There is no record of the number ofpopular votes for this election. My opinion of why Polk won this election is because of his stand on land. He believed greatly in Manifest Destiny, and this was very popular at thetime. Clay, and the Whig party never made it clear as to where they stoodon Texas. Perhaps if the voters had known for sure on which side of theline they stood, this election might have had a different outcome. 1912 The election of 1912 was a three-man race between Theodore Roosevelt, whowas a Progressive, William H. Taft, a Republican, and Woodrow Wilson, aDemocrat. Each one had their own ideas on how to change America, but onlyone would get a chance to do so. Born in NYC on October in 1858, Theodore Roosevelt was a Harvard graduate. His interests included ranching, politics, and writing. Roosevelt was aRepublican member of the New York assembly from 1882-1884. He was anunsuccessful candidate for mayor of NYC in 1886, but became policecommissioner of NYC in 1895. Roosevelt assumed the job of president in1901, after the assassination of McKinley. Theodore Roosevelt embarkedmainly on conserving natural resources. He was very anit-big-buisness. After his term was up, he was defeated in presidential primary as aRepublican, so he chose to start his own party, known as theProgressives. Teddy pulled most of the votes in election of 1912, butthe split between him and Taft caused Wilson to become president. Harrison Bergeron Essay Why F.D.R. won the election in my opinion is because he was a greatpresident. The American people loved him, and his style of government. Hegained the trust of the American people, by getting them out of the GreatDepression. That is why he was elected to the presidency more than anyother president before his time. 1964 The election of 1964 was a contest between Lyndon B. Johnson, a Democrat,and Barry M. Goldwater, a Republican. Johnson was born on August 27, 1908, near Johnson City, Texas, the eldestson of Sam Early Johnson, Jr., and Rebekah Baines Johnson. Johnsonattended public schools in Johnson City and received a B.S. degree fromSouthwest Texas State Teachers College in San Marcos. He then taught for ayear in Houston before going to Washington in 1931 as secretary to aDemocratic Texas congressman, Richard M. Kleberg. In 1933, Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected President. Johnson greatly admired the president,who named him, at age 27, to head the National Youth Administration inTexas. In 1937, Johnson sought and won a Texas seat in Congress, where hemastered public works, reclamation, and public power programs. When warcame to Europe he backed Roosevelts efforts to aid the Allies. DuringWorld War II he served a brief tour of active duty with the U.S. Navy inthe Pacific, but returned to Capitol Hill when Roosevelt recalled membersof Congress from active duty. Johnson continued to support Rooseveltsmilita ry and foreign-policy programs.In 1953 he won the job of SenateDemocratic leader. The next year he was easily reelected as senator andreturned to Washington as majority leader, a post he held for the next 6years despite a serious heart attack in 1955. Barry Morris Goldwater, born in Phoenix, Arizona on January 1, 1909, wasthe unsuccessful Republican presidential candidate in 1964. Goldwater waselected to the Senate from Arizona in 1952. A firm conservative, he becamea spokesman for right-wing Republicans in their campaign against biggovernment, advocating instead greater state and local powers. Hevigorously opposed federal welfare appropriations as socialistic and soughtto curb public ownership of utilities. A strong anti-Communist, Goldwatersupported American military intervention in Vietnam and criticized effortsto achieve detente with the USSR. He was decisively defeated by LyndonJohnson in the 1964 presidential election. Goldwater served in the Senateuntil retirement in 1987. Each candidate won his nomination by a Presidential Convention, with theprocess of primary elections. There were no third-party candidates in thiselection. The main issue of this election was civil rights. Many people opposedLyndon B. Johnsons laws, claiming them to be too pro-black. Manyliberals and blacks themselves believed that the laws didnt go far enough. Race riots broke out in a number of cities because of these conflicts. The winner of the election was Johnson, by a landslide. He brought in apopular vote total of 43,129,484, and an electoral vote total of 486. Goldwater, on the other hand, won a popular vote total of 27,178,188, andan electoral vote total of 52. The reason Johnson won the election of 1964, in my opinion is because ofhis prior term. He was able to regain control of the White House, aftertaking over for the assassinated John F. Kennedy. It was a time ofequality and civil rights, and many people liked and agreed with where hestood on these issues. 1988 The election of 1988 was a contest between George Bush, and MichaelDukakis. Bush was a Republican, while Dukakis was a Democrat. Born on June 12, 1924, in Milton, Massachusetts, to Dorothy Walker Bush,daughter of a wealthy investor, and Prescott Sheldon Bush, a banker andlater Republican U.S. senator from Connecticut, George Bush grew up in theNew York City suburb of Greenwich, Connecticut and attended PhillipsAcademy in Andover, Mass. During World War II he became the navysyoungest bomber pilot. Shot down over the Pacific island of Chichi Jimaand rescued by a submarine, he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Crossand three Air Medals. In 1945 he married Barbara Pierce and thenmatriculated at Yale University, where he majored in economics, was captainof the baseball team, and graduated with Phi Beta Kappa honors in 1948. Michael Stanley Dukakis, born in Brookline, Massachusetts, November 3,1933, a three-term governor of Massachusetts, was the Democraticpresidential candidate in 1988. The son of immigrants from Greece, Dukakisgraduated from Swarthmore College and Harvard Law School. He was electedto the Massachusetts legislature in 1962, serving four terms. Electedgovernor of Massachusetts in 1974, Dukakis was denied re-nomination in1978. Re-elected in 1982 and 1986, he claimed credit for part of theperiods economic resurgencethe Massachusetts miracle. The stateseconomy had soured when he declined to run again in 1990. Stressingcompetence over ideology, Dukakis campaigned for the presidency in 1988in a manner that many observers found uninspiring. He and his runningmate, Sen. Lloyd Bensten of Texas, lost to the Republican team, George Bushand Dan Quayle, by 46% to 54% of the popular vote. After leaving office asgovernor of Massachusetts, Dukakis declared that he planned to do somelecturing and teachi ng, as well as encouraging young people to enter publicservice. Each candidate in this election was elected by the process of primaryelections, and nominated at their Presidential Convention. There were nothird-party candidates in this election. The main issue of this election was taxes. Bushs promise of no newtaxes won over the American public. Bush won the election with a popular vote total of 48,886,097, and anelectoral vote of 426. Dukakis received a popular vote total of41,809,074, and an electoral vote total of 111. The reason Bush won the election in my opinion was because of his promiseof no new taxes. The American people just came off of a Regan High,with good economic times. People thought the things would remain like theydid during the Reagan Era if they elected Bush. The most important election in my opinion of all of these was theelection of 1812. America was heading into a war which we werent preparedfor. This was a crucial time for someone to take the reigns, and leadAmerica into a situation in which we would come out on top. Madison wasthe right man for the job, at such a crucial time in American History.